News, notes, other stuff

29 October, 2010

Journalism Now - 18th Century Press / The American Revolution

The press has always been as dynamic as its subject matter. Alongside constantly changing political and cultural climates, the press is affected by individual house regulations, legal issues concerning what can and cannot be said (i.e. libellous statements) and taxes which directly affect the profitability of the business. An example of the latter is 60 years before the American Revolution: Queen Anne was unhappy with the British press at the time, and sought to punish them for their distribution of “false and scandalous libels.” Subsequently, this led Parliament to pass the Stamp Act of 1712. The effects of the Stamp Act were still strong until 1861, when the tax on paper was lifted.

The paper tax served to restrain the size of pages in a publication. It made editors attempt to navigate those rules by simply changing the size and type of text to fit more on a page, and resort to cramming information in. This resulted in pages containing nothing but a formless mass of text, as line breaks and stylisation were considered a waste of the increasingly precious space.

The ultimate purpose of the Stamp Act was to force publishers to raise their sale prices correspondingly to the taxes on paper, advertisements and the business in general, which meant that their newspaper was less widely circulated than before. Because of this, most independent publications disappeared.

The only way that the remaining newspapers could prevent their businesses from folding was by selling space in their papers to advertisers – which is still in practice to this day. Publication of most mass media would be impossible without sponsorship. Advertisements were representative of the events at the time – when the fight for American independence began in 1775, a lot of space was bought to promote army recruitment.

Peacetime was also largely influential on the proliferation of the newspaper. Consumers were always likely to want to read about a war in which England was currently embroiled; when a war finished, a percentage of the readership would vanish with it. Sales dipped in peacetime decades such as 1720 and 1780, but those periods were when other conventions in newspapers started to become popular. Advertisements, sports and fashion pieces became more prominent for the lack of war-reporting. Political news and commentary from America was also a feature after the American Revolution, because the English public were curious to see how the newly independent country was organising itself.

While English publications were formerly shipped to America, it was not long until colonists established their own local papers. The journalists on either side would then correspond through letters: Felix Farley's Bristol Journal had contacts in both Boston and Philadelphia in 1747. Articles would either consist of extracts from a letter or information derived from it: the Gloucester Journal reported the news of an unsuccessful advance across central America, citing a letter addressed to a Jamaican gentleman as its source.



References used:
  • Alfred Grant - Our American Brethren: A History of Letters in the British Press During the American Revolution, 1775-1781. McFarland Publishers
  • Jeremy Black – The English Press, 1621 – 1861. Sutton Publishing

28 October, 2010

Spectator No. 476 - Method gives Light

Joseph Addison did make me chuckle, despite having to copy his essay into word and change all the stupid uppercase-for-noun that I guess was fashionable at the time. But the man does have a point, which after all the reading we've done is probably more relevant to us than it would have been 3 months ago, and his point is this: pearls of wisdom are better when they're strung together, rather than garbled down on the page like a stream of conciousness. Accessible work is memorable work.



20 October, 2010

HCJ 2 - Seminar on John Locke - Tabula Rasa



Locke is adamant that all idea comes from experience, be it external stimulus or introspection. He argues that the depth and breadth of stimuli, and the amount of reflection a person performs on their collected experiences of these sensible qualities prove to 'furnish the mind with ideas about its own operation.' He rejects the idea of innateness and says that all children are born as blank slates (tabula rasa), ready to assimilate knowledge through life experience.

14 October, 2010

Thoughts on the latest WINOL bulletin


I don't know what to say or how to say it without being too critical or too crawly but I'll have a go anyway, sincerest apologies to anyone that I might rub the wrong way.

I liked:
  • The thumping techno soundtrack in the opening
  • The way that whole opening thing is made
  • How professional the main two presenters sounded, expressive and clear
  • Much of the editing in general - interviews with the public, transitions etc
Not so hot on:
  • Sound getting a bit hammy around the international student ID problems section
  • Filming the screen for the bit about the queen
  • The item about the Queen in general really, but I guess that's only because it personally doesn't interest me. Treason, right?
  • The sports bits, but again, refer to the above.
  • The name for an interviewee being flashed too quickly to read
  • An awkward silent gap between the presenter speaking and a shot panning out through some houses
So yeah, my criticisms seem centred around little bits of editing and subject matter which didn't tickle my fancy. The second one is obviously less important, as I'm probably in the minority of British people that don't care about footy or the Queen. I would mention the spelling errors in the sports results but I don't wanna kick anyone while they're already down from what I heard, its a bit mean.


I'll finish this by saying that I really can't wait to be a part of WINOL, with the vain hope that I'm not just going to be cannon-fodder in the blogs of next years freshers. I guess we'll see.

06 October, 2010

HCJ 1 Reading

Photo of Aristotle
Here's my bastardisation of what I've learnt in the past week or so.


Aristotle is a name which keeps just cropping up again and again. I'm sure that he would've been chuffed with the way his teachings got the cut and paste treatment with the Bible. It led to several centuries of scholastic reverence of his logic and was par for the course for any university student, with no alternative offered. Thereafter, it was near impossible for the individual to have freedom of thought; even the most learned of men had been told what to think, and how to think it. This meant that rather than looking at things from a different angle or questioning the knowledge of Aristotle men were content to simply learn his ponderings by route, and bring nothing new to the table. Any novel ideas potentially dangerous to the Church (which would have been essentially anything and everything that contradicted either the Bible or Aristotle) were spirited away amid cries of heresy. The move to Platonist values aided the eventual expansion of minds beyond that of the generic Latin-and-Aristotle happy meal of before.